Ahead of today’s Senate Banking subcommittee hearing on “Fees and Tactics Impacting Americans’ Wallets,” government watchdog Accountable.US released a new analysis dispelling top myths employed by the credit card industry to excuse hidden and excessive late fees – including claims that lowering these junk fees will somehow have adverse effects on borrowers and that high credit card fees are actually beneficial to consumers.

FINANCIAL INDUSTRY RHETORIC VS REALITY ON JUNK FEES: 

RHETORIC: Industry groups, such as the Consumer Bankers Association and Independent Community Bankers of America have argued that “junk fees” simply do not exist, calling the CFPB’s rulemaking “misguided.”

RHETORIC: Industry claims that capping late fees at $8 would cause issuers to raise the cost of credit for consumers.

RHETORIC: Industry argues that the CFPB’s credit rule would be “especially” harmful “for the most vulnerable consumers.

  •     REALITY: Data collected by the CFPB shows that low-income and Black-majority communities are already the most impacted by high credit card late fees.

RHETORIC: Industry argues that lowering credit card late fees would create fewer incentives for Americans to make payments on time.

RHETORIC: Credit card issuers argue that the new “safe harbor” rule will not allow banks to adequately cover the costs of missed payments by Americans.

READ MORE FROM ACCOUNTABLE.US: 

Who’s Not Celebrating CFPB’s Birthday? Bad Industry Actors

Before Biden ‘Junk Fee’ Event, Here’s What to Know About Industries That Exploit Them

back to top