New Tax Filings Reveal Leonard Leo’s Self-Enrichment Scheme and Deepening Investigations
Report: Trump Pick for Top State Department Role Penned Essays Promoting White Nationalism, Islamophobia & Conspiracy Theories
Trump’s Transition: More Conflicts, More Risks
Watchdog: Trump Transition Fully Operating Over Private Emails and Servers a Recipe for Corruption & National Security Threats
Watchdog: Trump and Billionaire Allies Are Prepared to Hurt Working Families
Site Menu

Barrett Said She Thinks Discrimination Is “Abhorrent.” Her Record Says Otherwise.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – During today’s Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Trump’s pick for the Supreme Court, Judge Amy Coney Barrett said she thinks “discrimination is abhorrent.” But a new report released this week by government watchdog Accountable.US reveals that Barrett sided with parties accused of discrimination in a sweeping 85% of cases, and sided with workers in just 8% of cases, in her time on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. 

“Barrett said she thinks discrimination is abhorrent, but her record tells a different story. Siding with those accused of discrimination 85% of the time shows that Barrett is no friend to workers, nor to those seeking redress for bigotry and harm they have experienced,” said Kyle Herrig, president of Accountable.US.

“As workers languish without an additional relief package, the Senate is jamming through a plainly anti-worker nominee for a lifetime appointment on the high court. The Senate’s warped priorities as millions of Americans continue to suffer have never been on more obvious display.”

Among these cases are the following egregious examples:

  • United States EEOC vs. AutoZone Inc., AutoZoners, LLC: Amy Coney Barrett voted against rehearing a ruling on racial segregation that the Seventh Circuit chief judge said legalized the “separate but equal” doctrine.
     
  • Taylor-Reeves v. Marketstaff, Inc.: Amy Coney Barrett voted to uphold the ruling in favor of the company because “‘requesting leave for strep throat’ is not a statutorily protected activity.”
     
  • Grussgott v. Milwaukee Jewish Day School, Inc.: Amy Coney Barrett said a woman with cognitive impairments could not sue under the Americans with Disabilities Act after she was terminated for responding to a parent who mocked her memory issues.

Read more of Accountable.US’s analysis of Amy Coney Barrett’s decisions in the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals against workers and discrimination here.

###

back to top